The Breakdown
Start with the part that matters: this is a civil complaint. A complaint is what one side says happened. It is not a finding, not a conviction, and not evidence of anything by itself. Anybody telling you otherwise has not read one before.
What the filing actually alleges is that roughly $5 million moved in a way the plaintiffs say it should not have. The document lays out dates and transfers. Those specifics are what will get tested.
No criminal charges have been filed. That could change and it might not.
The hearing is in six weeks and it is public. The filing itself is also public, which is why the screenshots going around are real even though the conclusions people are drawing from them are not.
- Who
- A company and its former officers
- What
- A civil complaint alleging about $5M was improperly taken
- Where
- Federal court
Harvey’s Take · Commentary, not reporting
Accused is not convicted. I need y’all to learn the difference before you type.
